Configuration identification is a core piece of configuration management and is defined by the IEEE as “an element of configuration management, consisting of selecting the configuration items for a system and recording their functional and physical characteristics in technical documentation”. In terms of software configuration management, configuration identification means being able to find and identify the correct version of any project artifact quickly and easily. The negative impact of having an ineffective configuration identification system is measured in terms of lost time and quality.
Labels identify specific versions of artifacts. The set of artifacts that constitute a version of a subsystem are, collectively and individually, identifiable by a particular version and label. Labels are therefore useful in re-use or referencing original sets of versioned artifacts.
The following is a suggested product artifact labeling convention that can be used for labeling paths and artifacts in the Product Directory Structure.
Identifies the system
Stands for the three letter acronym (TLA!) for the various kinds of artifacts used in the creation of the system. For example,
PLN Project Plans REQ Requirements Files USC Use Cases MOD Model Files SRC Source Code Files INT Public Interfaces TST Test Scripts and Results DOC Documentation (User, Release Notes) BIN Executables
Identifies each subsystem
Stands for the three letter acronym for the various kinds of artifacts used in the creation of the subsystem. In accordance with the table above.
R|A|B Stand for release, alpha, or beta Integer, stands for a major release (e.g. 1) Integer (optional), stands for a minor release Integer (optional), stands for an alternative release (patches, ports, etc.) BL Stands for base level (an internal release) # Integer, for internal releases
Here are some examples:
|T2K_R1.0||Release 1 of the Thorn 2000 system|
|T2K_GUI_R2.0.BL5||Internal release of the GUI system intended for delivery in release 2|
|T2K_B1.1||Beta release 1.1 of the Thorn 2000 system|
|T2K_R2.0.BL16||Internal system baseline #16 of thorn 2000 intended for creating release 2|
|T2K_R1.0.5||Maintenance release of Thorn 2000|
Define Baselining Practices
A baseline provides a stable point, and a snapshot of the project artifacts. Concepts: Baselining describes when in the project lifecycle baselines need to be created. This step provides further guidance on the practice.
Baselines identify fixed sets of versions of files and directories and are created at given project milestones. Baselines can be created for a subsystem, or for the entire system. Baselines should be identified in accordance with the scheme outlined in the preceding process step (Define the Artifact Labeling Convention).
One distinction that needs to be made at the time of creating a baseline are whether you will be creating:
- A ‘Subsystem Baseline’ with ALL the versions of files and directories that have been modified in the subsystem or subsystems.
- A ‘System Baseline’ with a SINGLE version of all files and directories in all subsystems.
As a general guideline, it would facilitate release management to create System Baselines at the major and minor project milestones, and Subsystem Baselines as required or at a higher frequency. As a ‘rule of thumb’ it is a good idea to create a baseline if up 30% of the components in a subsystem have been changed.
Define Archiving Practices
The purpose of this step is to ensure that project software and related assets (master documents) are backed-up, catalogued and transferred to designated storage sites. Archives show their value in times of re-use or disaster. As such, archives need to be done regularly and at major and minor milestones.
Labeling guidelines described earlier under the process step ‘Define the Artifact Labeling Convention’ can be used when creating archiving labels. However, additional information may be required on where the actual media is to be stored. For example:
|VOLUME||1 of 3|
|DATE OF STORAGE||99-June-21|
All product related information should be maintained on a database to facilitate release and re-use.
Define Configuration Status Reporting Requirements
Here, you should select reports that can be derived from the Change Requests submitted to the project. There are a number of useful Change Request based reports.
Under the ‘aging’ category, reporting could be requested in terms of the number of Change Requests over time periods of a week or month based on the following criteria:
Listing problems by state can help determine how close to completion the project might be. For example, if the bulk of the problems have been resolved then completion is closer than if the bulk of the problems are in the submitted state.
Under the ‘distribution’ category, reporting could be requested to answer the following types of questions:
- Who is finding, what kind of defects, at what point in the project?
- Who are the problems being assigned to?
- How many problems are open under a given engineer?
- How severe are the defects that are being found?
- Where in the process are the problems being caused (root cause)?
- When are the problems getting fixed?
- How many defects are there?
- How severe are these defects?
These metrics can help in the analysis of work load, who is working on the most critical problems, and how quickly the problems are being closed.
Under the ‘trend’ category, reports could be requested to answer the following types of questions:
- How many defects are open this day, week or month?
- How many defects have been closed this day, week or month?
This data is useful assessing repair rates and could provide indications of engineering efficiency.
Define Reporting Frequency
Ensure that reports are received at the right frequency to be provide meaningful input for decision making. Reports could be requested on the following basis:
- Daily – it is unlikely that reports would be required at this frequency
- Weekly – Trend, Distribution and Count Reports, Build Reports
- Monthly – Trend, Distribution and Count Reports, Build Reports
- By Iteration – Trend, Distribution and Count Reports, Build Reports, Version Descriptions
- By Phase – Trend, Distribution and Count Reports, Audits, Build Reports, Version Descriptions
- At Project-End – Trend, Distribution and Count Reports, Audits, Build Reports, Version Descriptions